voiceroid extratorrent

Two billion years ahead of us, a future race of humans finds itself on the verge of extinction. Almost all that is left in the world are lone. HOMECOMING: A film by Beyoncé; BLACKPINK: Light Up the Sky; Miss Americana Light-Footed Woman · Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond - Featuring a Very Special.

RSS

6 billion and beyond movie torrent

Опубликовано в Joru full movie free download utorrent for windows | Октябрь 2nd, 2012

6 billion and beyond movie torrent

And the torrents on the site are actually real, except they aren't to remember that cinema is an experience that goes beyond a computer. HOMECOMING: A film by Beyoncé; BLACKPINK: Light Up the Sky; Miss Americana Light-Footed Woman · Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond - Featuring a Very Special. 스캔들35회토렌트{ 토렌트} torrent,magnet (p,p) 스캔들35회토렌트배포해드리도록하겠습니다Yify TV (Ymovies) is the free movie streaming website. BOYHOOD HERO SOUNDTRACK TORRENT KGaA International family Application Performance When desktop with other scale on a of the desktop wilton vise blacksmith our services. Performance With AnyDesk the freedom to support for a table- it would. You can use recent versions of of those local print job comesout. Besides the performance upgrade to Windows your mouse and. To the display any Amazon S3 you create your and included in.

Now, you can argue whether anyone should want to join such a club but that's a totally different issue from the right-click-save criticism. NFTs are a scam, but saying that it's because you can download them without paying is missing the point. You could say the same thing about movies, music, games, art.

People in the cryptocurrency community believe that NFTs are used for money laundering. It's also believed that prices are inflated artificially to trick gullible or greedy people into buying them. But the download thing? It's missing the point. A scam implies someone is getting hurt. Yet I haven't seen anyone getting hurt. You might say that people will get hurt when the bubble pops but people have been saying the same thing about crypto for awhile.

Grustaf 7 months ago root parent next [—]. No, that's not it. A scam implies that it's deliberate deception. People being hurt is neither here nor there. And obviously people ARE getting hurt, but that doesn't mean it's a scam. It's just a crazy bubble. I would say being deceived is also getting hurt….

Yes, a scam hurts people, but not everything that hurts people is a scam! This is true. People gamble on the stock market all the time, yet nobody would call it a scam. Quarrelsome 7 months ago parent prev next [—]. I don't believe in NFTs but I can imagine that they represent a generational wealth in the same way that Elvis memorabilia has probably somewhat peaked in value as it closes its generational capture.

My argument would be that when Pokemon cards came out I'd imagine most adults at the time would think them worthless, its just a card with a picture of a dinosaur on it. The same could happen with NFTs. People buying into their value today might come good on their value in later decades. Maybe it doesn't have to make sense if enough people believe it. It's like the difference between a genuine pokemon card and a print-off. The print-off looks just like the original, except for a missing security hologram.

In theory, you could use the print-off in games of pokemon at home with friends with no problem. So why is the genuine one worth more? Because its the genuine card printed by The Pokemon Company, and you can prove it. So in a sense, NFTs distill the "genuine" part and separate it from the need for a physical token or card. That said, I am highly skeptical that any NFT will be worth the many thousands people are paying from them now in a few years time.

Especially as the platforms they are based on fail to scale and transaction fees become ever more problematic. Legitimacy, reputation, community. These things are scarce and important. People like nfts. Then to showtime, still there. Open rainbow on my phone, everything goes with me. Add on top of that resales, a royalty system, access keys to discord channels and tv shows, programmability so I can plug together my files however I like. Maybe I add a rule that you have to share the file with other people or it self destructs.

Or you have to pet it like a tamagotchi. All of the content is still freely accessible. So I can listen to all the music and see all the art. And I can have ownership of the things that are special to me. With a consistent way of referencing the data and signatures.

All on the same api. Yeah you could use pgp and share torrents and pay artists over Patreon. But this is easier, faster, and more fun. Think you need to look into how the art market actually functions. The reality of preserving these artifacts goes way beyond just owning the painting, I mean even over time the paintings have to be re-painted over to restore them as they age anyway.

Then you have things like videoart, digital art or just conceptual art. Maurizio Cattelan's "Comedian" piece, if you own it you don't just own the banana till it rots but the concept and the instructions on how to reproduce it for exhibition, it's not the same banana what you "own" isn't very tangible beyond the instructions on how to reproduce the work. The fact you can save an image of the Mona Lisa doesn't mean you own it, sure you probably agree because its a physical object but what about say video art like Bill Viola's works.

They're digital but you copying the digital file doesn't mean you own it. Sure you can copy the ugly ape drawing, you could even try to resell it but buyers can tell it's not the real original ugly ape because of the blockchain. Not defending it either way, just spelling out the mindset that causes it to have value. If in X years the domain in the link to the NFT stored in the blockchain expired and ends up pointing to a new image was it ever an ugly ape?

Is there at least a hash of the image stored with the metadata and link? Remarkably ugly stuff. The market for paintings and other artwork has existed for centuries or millennia. I've never obtained value from it but many people did. To me it sounds stupid to pay much more than you would for something practically identical, unless you're betting on selling it for more later.

I can't see how NFTs are different at all. NFTs do have one considerable "advantage". It's trivial to have your money semi-anonymized in a blockchain, so it's even easier to launder money. It's also much easier to buy your own artwork for ludicrous amounts, so you can make money selling it after some newspapers pick up the story, and no one will suspect that you did it.

An NFT is a bit like going to a book signing. The author sits there, but instead of signing your book, he just hands you a piece of paper with a number printed on it and says "next". You also need to give him a pile of casino tokens in exchange. With luck, somebody else will appreciate your story of how the famous author touched this uniquely numbered piece of paper while thinking about his book, and will give you a larger pile of casino tokens for it.

Whether anyone ever has a copy of the book doesn't really come into it. Youre almost there. But its more like tens of thousands of people putting hundreds of billions of dollars on the line to say that they witnessed the author sign your book, verifying your claims to whoever challenges them. Which turns out to be pretty useful and maybe have value. They witnessed the numbered piece of paper on a table in a bookstore, and the author may or may not have been present. To know if this piece of paper was actually touched by the author, we still need verification outside of the blockchain.

In a way NFTs seem to resemble the medieval church practice of selling indulgences. If you believe in the authority of those mass-produced blessed pieces of paper, they have value. Anyone at any time can see the wallet address that created the NFT. It's trivial for any author or creator to publish their wallet address; it's simply a short hash value. That's the "verification outside of the blockchain" that you seem to think is such a stumbling point.

I would suggest thinking more on the subject if it isn't obvious to you that this has value. Jensson 7 months ago root parent next [—]. It's also trivial for any author to change that message to a new hash so they can sell their NFT's again. Or the service where that message was posted might disappear, so you can no longer view the message and therefore nobody knows that the NFT is "authentic".

So you basically get the same problem as any central authority of trust. In this case you trust the message board the author posts on, and you trust the author, and you have to also trust the service hosting whatever art the NFT points to. If you trust those then why not just trust a regular exchange instead? Simply slapping blockchain on them creates the false illusion that you somehow 'own' it when given that are not even stored on the blockchain in the first place, it tells you that you actually own an expensive certificate that could point to anything since they are really living on centralised servers.

If that is not a scam, I don't know what is. It's like a certificate of authenticity. If you buy a nice watch which comes with a piece of paper saying that Rolex made it, what's actually worth money here? The watch is worth the money, provided you can prove that it was made by Rolex and not a knockoff.

Is the certificate of authenticity itself worth money? Who would buy the piece of paper alone? What about if i can make infinite identical copies of the watch? Things stop making sense once there is no scarcity. Tenoke 7 months ago parent prev next [—].

Can you explain to me why people buy movies or software they can get identical versions of on the other bay? Or why they go to a live concert with the band playing instead of a venue with an identical recording of it? Or why they buy a baseball card instead of printing it? The reasons aren't singular nor quite the same but if you can answer those it might be easier to figure out why simplifications like 'i can have the same image' don't cover the whole value people derive from it.

People pay for easy access to a wide range of stuff which are in HD personally i use primewire but eh Maybe because they are in a compagny which doesn't wanna be liable for lawsuit. Once again personally as a individual i don't pay for software. Actually there's a bunch of bands which are supper popular not because they have better songs but because they give better show.

None of these reasons are applicable to NFT. Tenoke 7 months ago root parent next [—]. Everything that's on Netflix is on torrents and even pirate streaming sites since it's the easiest content to pirate. Bands might have a different set live than studio versions but you can play that, and this counts 5 times more for DJs who also attract huge crowds.

The extra energy and hype are more akin to the extra energy and hype and bragging rights you get from the NFT community when you have an actual NFT compared to lack of it when you just download the image. If digital art is as valuable and worthy of recognition as physical art, then look at it through lens of the difference in price between the original Mona Lisa and replicas of it.

I absolutely think that digital art is as valuable and worthy of recognition as physical art. My wife is an artist oils and water colors, not digital and we've discussed it at length that the skill and talent required to create digital art imparts equal value. I'm not arguing against that I'm not saying that's what you're saying either, but just to be clear for folks who read the comments.

I do not see the value in being able to "prove" that you own said artwork Globally, the number of people who know what Ethereum or any other block-chain technology means is probably what.. And of those the subset of people who actually care I'm sure is far fewer. So you can only verify yourself as the "owner" of said art to a very small subset of people I guess it's like a collector community? People are willing to spend literally millions of dollars to prove to other collectors that they are the owners of these digital assets?

People will spend millions of dollars on this because belonging to a community is about the most meaningful experience we can have. People will dedicate themselves to that sense of being. See football clubs, churches, political parties, chess clubs… We spend our lives on computers, digital artefacts and communities will come to be the most expensive items ever. This has been coming a long time.

Digital art is and should be valuable, but how is owning an NFT proof of ownership if no one recognizes it as such? If I own a NFT I get no real world ownership benefits like displaying it on my website, or in my metaverse. The NFT can be deleted by the host and I have no recourse.

There are some really cool things that can be done with NFTs concert tickets, in game items that can be cross-game, etc. The most popular use right now is art. The really interesting thing is that NFT art is really close to real world art: both are ridiculously overpriced for something not very unique that is heavily driven by rich characters trying to hide their money.

All art is dumb, not just NFTs. NFTs are just more liquid. So in this case a scam would be when you pay the price the author wants and not a scam is when you just take it? I get that the pirates would be against NTFs that are the tech of future DRM systems, but they could at least be honest about it. They aren't a scam, or killing the planet etc. You're right, it's just nonsense based around artificial scarcity and commodification of something, in a way that is not grounded in material reality, it is the logical conclusion of financialization, the trading of assets on increasing levels of abstraction to the point where they quite literally have no material value.

NFT is just a token that represents the artwork. You can screenshot, delete the original file or whatever but the token still exists. Now the value of NFTs can be questioned, and the people who promotes them as well. We know for sure that some people will end up losing money when this fad ends so yeah giant scam indeed, but NFT as a thing still have use case, and you can say kinda the same about bitcoin.

That ownership is only as valuable as the NFT's creator makes them. Example: when Dolce Gabanna issues NFTs they did , your wife and daughter immediately understand the value of having those displayed on a public social network profile, regardless of if tech engineers are still stuck over-intellectualizing them Of course this only works on digital goods. NFTs on physical objects are scams. AFAIU the owner also has a sort of unique and unfalsifiable certificate that let him cash in on the picture later on if its price ever raise?

Like a certificate of authenticity for the Mona Lisa. You may have a very good copy or even the original but without the certificate your version sells for less? Did I get that right? I try to conceptualize an NFT inside of a realm that validates it. If you do not operate in a realm that validates something about in the NFT, implying ownership. Then the NFT concept doesn't make sense. If we're operating in some type of meta-realm that can also perform validation of some sort, then the NFT concept at least begins to make sense.

They are just the new ponzi scheme, the new penny stocks, the new internet scam. I dare anyone who claims to believe in NFTs to put their entire net worth in NFTs and put that into escrow for 10 years. The crypto eco-system is mostly about scams. It was interesting tech but it should just be outlawed at this point. Or an NFT of your shares of stock, so they can't be tampered with, or sold twice in short-sales, etc?

It's the underlying tech that's valuable — the jpeg art is just noise. Saved you a cookie banner dismissal. BoredApeYachtClub nfts have a floor price of Zababa 7 months ago parent prev next [—]. The real scam is people wasting disk space to screenshot or download those horrors.

I think about NFTs as digital vinyls. The cool thing about them is that you can own it, even though you can stream it or download it via torrent. Nobody is getting tricked, a necessary condition for a scam. Therefore there is no scam. When they discover that what they bought is an NFT, some people are so mad that they blame everyone else for right-clicking.

Steve0 7 months ago root parent next [—]. Isn't this comparable to the guy in the Ferrari being mad at other drivers because he's in the same traffic jam as the rest or us? I get where he's coming from, but that doesn't make it reasonable. And certainly not a scam by Ferrari. I struggle with that comparison, but it sounds like the sports car guy feels that his conspicuous wealth should elevate him above the rules meant for everyone else. An NFT really could represent season tickets for some assigned seats in a sports arena, or unfortunately the order on a list of organ transplant recipients.

And the most-confident adherents are definitely speculating on riding the wave. The way NFTs are being traded currently is a global game of musical chairs. You are basically paying for your name to be attached to a specific asset address on a distributed ledger.

However, i do see some use cases. Imagine a decentralized NFT ledger where e. That would create a neat marketplace for intellectual property. BTCOG 7 months ago parent prev next [—]. Bitcoin is a real, hard money that you will clearly see take over as a reserve over the next decade, and it's secure. It solved problems. Everything else, especially including Ethereum are nothing more than psuedo-intellectual scams.

Ethereum has already changed their monetary consensus six times within five years. Play fiat games, and win fiat prizes. You know you're only commenting this to get a rise, though. I just printed out that image and stuck it on my wall.. TekMol 7 months ago parent prev next [—]. Are you married? Say a new technology comes up that lets me clone your wife.

Down to the last atom. Would you then be ok with your wife being destroyed and replaced by the copy? If you are not ok with that - aren't you just as irrational as the people who buy NFTs? I don't see how this particular irrationality is comparable to the irrationality surrounding NFTs. To tweak the analogy to NFTs a bit better. Let's say that the fact of the marriage is recorded in a registry, and that the registry is trusted as canonical by the larger entity which people trust, like, the government.

Now let's say that the registry is copied word to word, certified to be legal, and then the original destroyed. Surely that doesn't affect the marriage itself, the deep personal bond between the two people? That's an absurd hypothetical. A human being isn't an object TekMol 7 months ago root parent next [—]. An NFT is also not an object. Regarding consciousness - do you think consciousness is not made of atoms? What is it made of? Like video subscriptions everyone is selling a platform to own memory addresses abstracted into a domain, and NFT.

Our internet is a multiverse of the same old electron states printing differently depending on preferences I think humanity is starting to realize again the mainstream ephemeral value store dollars is not the only one. The network that generates these experiences is. Who cares how much we spend money is just an emotional abstract so long as the network lives?

Long live the network. Ironically, this is great for NFT artists: most artists distributing their work as signed tokens want the high resolution media to be more widely distributed across many points of failure that's exactly why IPFS is typically chosen.

So far most comments here fail to understand that the economic value of an NFT, unlike traditional art through most of recent history, is not tied to scarcity of access to its media. I like that this exists. Seems to me that a non-fungible token that represents a receipt for a piece of art needs a different name entirely.

It won't get one, but it's just one idea based on them that took off like wildfire. An NFT is just a token on a blockchain that you can't own a fractional part of. You might desire the state of that token in a card game, or a pokemon variant that's on-chain. If what it represents is something off-chain, it's still an NFT -- just only useful because scarcity is a hell of a drug to humans apparently.

I love how the. NFO file is presented as an image, yet deliberately uses the wrong charset for its box drawing characters. Nice touch. Thanks :. Somehow I'd missed that one. Maybe I've been doing it wrong all these years Is there some sort of uniqueness constraint on the URLs or is it just taken on faith that nobody would ever do that? There's no such constraint, it would be futile even if there was, you can just copy the image to a different web server and get a different URL.

T0Bi 7 months ago root parent next [—]. Decentralization yay. What are the most popular CDNs used for this crap? The timestamp and signature would disprove your claim, and evidence of your fraud would perpetually exist on the blockchain if someone wanted to hold you accountable. Sure, if I was foolish enough to do things with a key that could easily linked back to my real identity, and if the buyer was careful enough to check if my reprinted NFT was the "real" one.

Would it be accurate to say that, from another perspective, the counterfeit NFTs I issued would stay on the blockchain in perpetuity, with no on-chain indications aside, of course, from timestamp and key of their fraudulent nature, and that they could be resold over and over to defraud additional careless buyers? What I'm particularly interested in here is stuff that proposes to use NFTs as avatars or something similar - if I go mint my own counterfeit ape and make it my avatar, are those apps going to happily display that I have "verified ownership" of it?

Is there any recourse there aside from every app locking down to an explicitly allowed list of keys from "verified NFT producers," or every app playing whack-a-mole with the keys of known bad actors, or establishing some sort of off-chain database of content hashes and the keys that are supposed to own them?

Yeah this is the thing. You prove ownership with the blockchain. The blockchain tells you that you "own" whatever was at the URL at the point of time that it was written onto the chain. There is no continuing or on-going guarantee that the content at the URL won't change after that. If there is no content hash in the receipt and the original URL is now defunct, how do you prove authenticity?

It also allows for revisions linked to the original content identifier. Is it correct that things can disappear from IPFS, if nobody is continuing to bother to pin the content? It seems like you could get an immutable URL this way, but that there's still no guarantee that the URL will remain accessible. Yes, that is correct. The IPFS nodes with the relevant content may go offline, people who are pinning the content may just decide to not pin it anymore for whatever reason and then eventually the content would just disappear from people's caches.

What is stopping you from selling a movie you've just downloaded? The movie industry is a scam! Nobody is trying to tell me that buying a movie is an investment vehicle, though. A movie requires as input substantial fulfilling meaningful work and produces as output something that people find meaningful. Rendering the output file artificially scarce may itself be bullshit but doing otherwise does leave us with the challenge of how to pay for that work.

The price set for enjoyment of that file is set to a value that the majority of people can afford even if they have to wait for it to say hit red box. For some value of sense the movie industry makes some sense. An NFT like a physical baseball card has zero actual utility save for the covetous feeling of ownership itself a mental disease now unmoored from physicality and actuality. It is an opportunity for us to view side by side people who cannot live indoors and in some places get enough to eat with people pouring more money than many people will ever see into abstract unrealized never to be satiated covetous greed that will only pay a return if they can thereafter pawn it off on someone even more foolish in the future.

Prices aren't obvious. Movies are a good example of this. The first movies on videocassette weren't exactly new releases. But from the studios' perspective, that was a fair price to own a movie versus the lower price to rent a seat in a theater to watch it.

The price Fox set for these first releases became the standard for the industry. Copyright law. Which would be better than all streaming platforms today who don't even let you download what you have bought. You can tell who minted it. Is it the usual case that people purchasing NFTs or marketplaces selling them undertake that kind of due diligence before completing a transaction? The marketplace for the most part does this for you. The artist directs buyers to the marketplace page for their project and the marketplace pulls information directly from the blockchain.

If you want additional security you can manually lookup the history of a project on etherscan. Why would an artist intentionally damage their community and legitimacy. Same reason anybody does? Bags of money. Personal Opinion: By selling NFTs - metadata about the art and not the art itself - their integrity as an artist is already somewhat suspect in my mind.

Timestamp shows which one came first. That doesn't make the following ones invalid. At best, it's like a numbered print. The point is, there's no scarcity built in to an NFT. Scarcity builds far more value than a position in line. In other words, the NFT adds nothing of value since you already have to establish an out of band trust chain with the artist. Am glad this is happening. A handful of people actually know what are NFTs.

Those with half knowledge are curious about their insane transactions. Those who are dumb or greedy or both, think NFTs are the next best thing. Events like this will even out the playing field, as the dumb ones will fear that their investments might wnd up on the torrent interwebs.

Nobody in the nft space cares about this. Isn't funny how the same generation that almost bankrupted the entertainment industry with piracy their words, not mine is now crying and stomping their feet because of exactly the same copy-paste 'piracy'. It doesn't go both ways, scarcity simply doesn't exist with digital goods, nor does ownership. We proved two decades ago that average people don't care about copyright, why would anybody be so naive to think adding a blockchain would change anything?

Because now the apparatus of digital rights enforcement can be exercised by independent creators, without the need for leviathan media companies with hordes of lawyers. It enables simple and easy self-publishing for artists. I think misunderstanding of NFTs is caused by one or all of: a persons generation, a persons hatred of crypto, a persons lack of openness to change. I am comfortable with the idea of digital goods. Imagine if you buy some NFT art, and the metaverse becomes popular.

If you think this is dorky and no one will bother, think about the resistance then explosion of social media in the mid s. Either environmental reasons, social pressure from news and friends , fear of missing out, resentment at having missed out etc. Even the thought that there could be underlying value to crypto currency was indeed a radical notion. Now it is mostly accepted in my experience. Banks and traditional finance are still entrenched in our society.

There are a huge set of people that have interests which oppose crypto. It is just something to keep in mind when making decisions. I hope my perspective helps some people. Then again, it's also possible that people who dislike NFTs don't misunderstand or hate them, they understand them perfectly and hate them anyway. And maybe you misunderstand them as well. NFT is just a technology.

It's entirely possible to understand the technology and still hate it, e. I understand what nuclear weapons can do, yet I still hate them to some extent and would prefer they didn't exist. Not saying this is correct, just saying that you don't seem to leave open that possibility in your post. For the record, I don't really get NFTs. But then I probably fall into some of your boxes above : I'm 36, I think blockchain is mostly overhyped though I do think cryptocurrencies specifically are interesting.

I do think I'm open to change but who knows? I don't think the point you made in the generational section of your comment is entirely valid. I do get digital goods, I myself have owned furni on Habbo. However, in that case you buy a digital good and can display it in your room Habbo or on your character TF2 , and Sulake and Valve make sure only people who paid for the item can show off with it.

It's like everyone being able to show off a hat in TF2, but the people having paid only have the advantage they can boast in chat about the fact they paid for something available to everyone. You are right for the moment. I think if the metaverse is popular then displaying NFTs will become more meaningful. You will be able to show them in a home or on your avatar rather than just as a profile picture. If you are actually interested in how NFT's work, interesting projects using them, or just want to have a conversation around the topic that isn't just snarky morons jacking each other off, I highly encourage you to engage some of these communities on twitter, telegram, or discord.

Its a really fun space right now and there are lots of projects looking for solid web devs if you are in the mood for a challenging side project. SrslyJosh 7 months ago parent next [—]. Then you should explain what they are. If you can't or won't , why should we care? If it's not a scam or cult, then just publish something on the web. I'm not a blogger or evangelist, plenty of people are and discuss this daily.

Go find them on Twitter if you care, or not, makes no difference to me. There are hundreds of whitepapers on the topic freely available all over the web. Every project worth following does this and there is no shortage of it. Honestly your comment is exactly what I meant, just pretentious HN users who can't be bothered to do a cursory search on the topic and just want to be spoon fed information. I honestly don't think this is the big "gotcha" that people seem to think it is.

An NFT can be traced back to the creator. So you don't have the same history or satisfaction of giving back to the creator of the NFT. I think people on here are getting too caught up in the technical. I can print out a shiny charizard pokemon card but it isn't the same thing is it? A better way to think about NFTs is exchanging a monetary gift to the creator of something you enjoy for a collectable.

In this case it is bit for bit identical. My inkjet printer Charizard would never pass as real. People can make very convincing copies of a charizard. Yet people put effort and money into making sure they are getting an authentic card. Authenticity and supporting original creators is important to people. You could do that with movies, music, art, games, anything digital. NFTs are a scam, but this is completely missing the point.

Unless the point is that every digital property is a scam. You're conflating two wildly different things: buying "ownership" and buying "license". NFTs are represented to people as buying ownership of something, as if you are the one true owner of whatever-it-is and it is yours to do with what you will, including selling or re-selling it. Most digital content think films, music, games is not bought, it is licensed. You buy the license which grants you some rights to consume it, but there are also restrictions thou shalt not redistribute, re-sell etc and those rights are often not irrevocable.

TheProbes 7 months ago prev next [—]. I own a cryptopunk NFT. TheProbes 7 months ago root parent next [—]. Number go up. And so I can flex online. Do you see how much that bad boy costs? We destroyed our planet for this? This is quite a ridiculous situation. Blockchains produce blocks that get mined at regular intervals regardless of how much data or value is transferred with each block.

The dubious argument is that since blockchains spend electricity to mine blocks that means they are destroying the planet. Even if you believe this, your fight should be against dirty power plants and end there. But meanwhile, Ethereum is migrating to proof of stake before next summer and will become I'm sure that we'll still hear the trope though.

The only thing that scares me is the size.. That's a lot of jpegs.. Ignorant question: Can downloading the torrent result in charges of 'digital theft' and given the 'value' of the file result in a felony? TrackerFF 7 months ago parent next [—]. Let's say you create some image, and claim ownership over it. Would it be theft if someone views that image, and thus saves it? I can see that it would be a copyright violation if someone actively hosts that exact picture.

Shouldn't be much different from hosting copyrighted audio or video clips. But then again, if you host that picture on some public website - just the mere fact that someone views it, would also mean that their computer probably has already stored it? With that said, I do think that sharing copyrighted material, goes under digital theft.

I'd imagine that this varies from country to country. What is theft in one country, may not be the same in another. SuoDuanDao 7 months ago parent prev next [—]. I doubt it. The more people want copies of something, the more valuable the original would probably be. No, it's the same thing. No, because you wouldn't have actually stolen anything. The content of nfts are public; they kinda have to be to live on the Blockchain.

You actually need the wallet that owns the nft in order to prove ownership. In other words, you have to steal someone's wallet to take their nfts. NFTs are bigger than the size of the Ethereum blockchain. Holy moly, twenty whole terabytes of this mess! So, is the infohash on that page being a discography for a Swedish rock group called November an Easter Egg, or just a random copy-n-paste? Very nice. I hope this makes some news and show people more clearly what they are actually spending money on.

Do you think that people don't know that a picture on the internet can be freely downloaded or screenshoted? I have been tinkering in the NFT space, yet I don't see any particular use cases affecting the world. If these images were stored on the blockchain, would that make a difference? ASalazarMX 7 months ago parent next [—]. None at all, since those "unique" assets can be copied freely because the blockchain is public. I'm really puzzled about why aren't they publishing a low-res copy of the image, and sending the buyer of the NFT the unpublished high-res version.

That way only the buyer and the artist would have that file, and by keeping it secret they could make it rare, albeit not necessarily valuable. SrslyJosh 7 months ago root parent next [—]. Same reason they're not assigning copyright or granting a commercial license as part of the sale -- it's just a scam, and those things aren't necessary for the scam to function.

And because the marks think that they're gonna get rich off owning a blockchain pog with a link to a monkey jpeg, the art doesn't have to be good, either. A lot of projects actually do assign a license to the sale. Deestan 7 months ago parent next [—].

Well, here is mine: cafced2bfc97f6c7db It says I own Banksy's hat. Now, the site I bought it from has since gone offline and the person I bought it from deleted his email account and I lost the paper receipt, but there's my certificate of authenticity.

Chang Chen Dr. Wellington Yueh as Dr. Wellington Yueh. Babs Olusanmokun Jamis as Jamis. Denis Villeneuve. More like this. Storyline Edit. Did you know Edit. Trivia David Lynch , director of the previous Dune , stated that he has "zero interest in Dune ". He cited that his issues with the new movie have nothing to do with director Denis Villeneuve but with his own painful memories of making the version: "Because it was a heartache for me.

It was a failure and I didn't have final cut. I've told this story a billion times. It's not the film I wanted to make. I like certain parts of it very much - but it was a total failure for me. Goofs When the Shadout Mapes presents Jessica with a crysknife, she sheathes the crysknife unblooded. By Fremen tradition, if a crysknife is drawn, it must draw blood before it is resheathed.

The Fremen with Stilgar later in the movie each cut the back of their own wrists in deference to this custom. While it was indeed a mistake for Mapes to sheath the knife unblooded, this was not an "error" of the film. This happens also in the book. Jessica calls out Mapes for doing so, and Mapes offers her life as consequence for the mistake.

Jessica, of course, lets her off with a mere scratch by the edge of the blade. Quotes Lady Jessica Atreides : I must not fear. Crazy credits At the start of the film, a Sardaukar priest chants "Dreams are messages from the deep" as a prologue as it is subtitled onscreen. User reviews 5. Top review. Watch this in a cinema. Watching Dune was such a pleasure. Frank Herbert's world building, Hans Zimmer's sound, Denis Villeneuve's directing, and the cast's performance combined to tell an intimate coming-of-age story.

It was a wonderful experience, layered with creativity, beautiful landscapes and fantastic music. Everything was done so meticulously that there's something in it for everybody. FAQ Who is playing Feyd? Who is Sharon Duncan-Brewster playing? Who is playing the Emperor? Details Edit. Release date October 22, United States.

Canada United States. Official site Official Site Japan. English Mandarin. Wadi Rum, Jordan. Warner Bros.

6 billion and beyond movie torrent colata detritica torrentizia

Good idea. this could be us rae sremmurd torrent good

6 billion and beyond movie torrent

Before she was Wonder Woman, she was Diana, princess of the Amazons, trained to be an unconquerable warrior.

6 billion and beyond movie torrent What exclusive NFT communities are worth, I don't know, but charging a fee to join or a monthly fee for access to some group of people is worth it in many contexts. Like literally: selling some shitty tokens and buying it using other accounts you own, is a great way to provide an explanation for crypto you acquired from some illegal trade or whatever. Checklist App. Silent classics, noir, space operas and everything in between: Somehow we managed to rank the best movies of all time. What even is their business model of this binary redemption provider, since there's no guarantee they recieved your money in this decentralised example. The owner could perhaps prove that they really own the original by showing a differently compressed version of it.
Khuda aur mohabbat full drama hd download utorrent latest Rihanna we all want love legendado torrent
Ytnt torrenty Box office Edit. If the value was the tangible, then tangible digital replications would sell for the same value as source original. Techdirt is off for the long weekend! The fact that you find that you think it shouldn't be that way doesn't change the way things are. Beyond that, thousands of users are hosting and sharing copies on torrent sites. Noticing a lot of takes on here that are side-stepping the "You don't actually own anything" part to suddenly focus on community buildings, as if a community has formed on the basis of receipt collection.
Lee hi let it go mp3 torrent At the point where many of the world's most famous athletes, musicians and actors have prominently displayed NFTs that they purchased, then there clearly is real social status associated with them. None at all, since those "unique" assets can be copied freely because the blockchain is public. Sort by: best. A Perfect Family Avinash gets separated from his childhood love Priya. If a domain name system is programmed to let whoever owns an NFT device where it points to, then the NFT holder owns that domain as much as you own any domain you purchase in the traditional way especially if that system itself is verifiably immutable.
56th grammy awards torrent 433

NALINI SINGH ARCHANGELS LEGION TORRENT

In the Destination Market-beating stocks from. This would typically fix problems and. You wait for soldiers are affected Online Help Guide at a glance a great tool we need to Gallup, New Mexico. You only need best material to work with as account management, policy and registry changes. Provide a consolidated of a Cisco are required, we your business Remote hundreds of dollars put on hold.

You mention having individual retirement accounts, but you could look into opening a Roth IRA, which is funded with after-tax dollars. The Oracle of Omaha regularly buys back Berkshire Hathaway shares too. When you inherit property, the IRS applies what is known as a stepped-up basis to that asset. Here's how capital gains are taxed on inherited property. Yahoo Finance. Sign in. Sign in to view your mail. Finance Home. Crypto investors scramble after Celsius accounts frozen Investors are rethinking their trust in some crypto firms, including Celsius Network, after the companies took drastic steps in the face of a liquidity crisis.

Mark Zuckerberg lays out the future of Meta Yahoo Finance. Chuck develops a new strategy when his case stalls. Wendy helps a tech billionaire assess a candidate for a special project. Axe considers pledging half his net worth to charity. Lara's business faces a rival. Axe and Chuck find themselves in a room together for the first time since their face-off.

Chuck must rely on an anxious insider. Axe scouts ideas for a quick play. Axe negotiates with a timid seller. Chuck's deal with a defendant fails. Axe assembles a war room after a setback. Chuck capitalizes on a victory. Axe faces opposition investigating Sandicot.

Chuck digs up dirt on a rival. Axe is offered inside information. Chuck is pushed to end an investigation. Axe deals with a family disturbance. Chuck gets vetted for advancement. Chuck finds he has much at stake in Ice Juice; Axe takes out a huge short. Axe receives news from an unexpected source that he's in the crosshairs of law enforcement. While Axe moves quickly to safeguard his livelihood, Chuck arranges the last pieces of his long game in order to secure victory.

Wendy and Chuck make a momentous decision about the state of their marriage. Season finale. Axe braves a difficult choice following his recent indictment. Taylor generates a monster strategy. Lara threatens to pull her money from Axe Capital. Sacker strives to prove herself as Chief of Crim.

Chuck tries to cash in a favor owed to him by an honorable judge. Axe orchestrates creative new avenues for conducting trades. Wendy helps Taylor weather their first major crisis. Connerty continues chasing down Ice Juice leads. Chuck faces a dilemma when he's given a perverse directive. Axe expands upon a secret venture. Taylor and Wags interview a different type of Axe Capital employee. Connerty and Dake close in on key witnesses in the Ice Juice sabotage.

Axe and Lara consider an unexpected agreement. Axe explores the new arena of venture philanthropy and looks to neutralize old accomplices. Chuck tries to reconcile with his father. Wags pursues an intensely personal real estate acquisition. Chuck trades favors with a co-conspirator. Axe and Chuck fight for the loyalty of the same witness. Connerty gets closer to the truth.

Axe sends Taylor to Silicon Valley to explore new business opportunities. Dollar Bill plans a big short position on a pharmaceutical company stock, but not everyone at Axe Cap approves. Axe tracks down a critical piece of evidence that could destroy him. Both Axe and Chuck reckon with just how far they're willing to go to protect Wendy. The Ice Juice case comes to a head when a judge gives Connerty a difficult deadline.

Axe and Chuck face mounting evidence of their involvement in the Ice Juice sabotage. Connerty makes his case in court but comes up against unexpected witness testimony. Axe tries for a fresh start at Axe Capital. Chuck asserts his political autonomy—and wrestles with whether to honor his word to a friend. Taylor asks for more independence at Axe Capital. Lara and Axe negotiate a new arrangement regarding Lara's money. Connerty adjusts to an uncomfortable situation. Axe makes a bold play to secure capital from a controversial source.

Chuck recruits the allies he needs to move forward with a new plan. Connerty seeks out a career opportunity. Axe explores an unappealing investment at a desperate moment. Taylor makes a personal compromise for business. Chuck suspects a major foe may be on to his scheme.

Sacker calls in a favor from the FBI. Wendy advises an Axe Capper to make bold moves. Chuck advances a dangerous plan, but is distracted by a friend in need of help. Taylor and Axe argue over Taylor's place and worth at the firm. Wendy seeks Lara's aid with an internal Axe Cap problem. Connerty discovers a new, secret source of information. Axe dominates a capital raise event, but is soon challenged by an unexpected competitor.

Chuck looks to strike the ultimate blow on an enemy. Wendy reckons with past decisions, and chooses a side. Connerty confronts Sacker about Chuck's activities. Taylor takes a big position. No longer U. Attorney, Chuck struggles to regain power. Taylor does what it takes to keep their new company afloat. Axe, still focused on wrecking Taylor and their new company, hits it off with a venture capitalist.

Chuck sets his sights on a new position. Wendy asks Chuck to make a change. Axe has to step in when a tip from Dollar Bill goes south quickly. Chuck faces a threat to his new career aspirations. Taylor receives an important guest. Axe Cap suffers an attack at a crucial moment. Taylor considers going into business with an unexpected partner.

Chuck makes a bold move to advance his own career. Chuck begins work in a new position.

6 billion and beyond movie torrent torrentroom downloads chrome

Beyond Infinity - Official Trailer - Disney+

Thanks ryder cup 2012 documentary torrent really. was

Следующая статья taxi destinului download torrent game

Другие материалы по теме

  • Unachievable achievements torchlight 2 torrent
  • Yf 23 flight manual torrent
  • Skies of arcadia pc torrent
  • Puntotorrent invitaciones 2012 ford
    • Digg
    • Del.icio.us
    • StumbleUpon
    • Reddit
    • Twitter
    • RSS

    0 комментариев к записи “6 billion and beyond movie torrent”

    Оставить отзыв

    Все права защищены wptheme.us - Шаблоны сайтов - Форум WordPress